ITAT
Amritsar Bench in an interesting decision of Smt. Kailash Devi ITA 347/ASR/
2015 pronounced on 05-04-2016 on conduct of survey had an occasion to ponder
over the obligations cast upon Income Tax Authorities under the law. Often
assessee and income tax authorities are at logger-heads for assessee not acting
as “required” but before authorities allege the assessee for not doing his part
of obligation, a line has to be drawn from
where assesse’s part of obligations commence, because it is easy to tell a person
how best to carry his pack until the
burden is on one’s own back.
Facts
of the case:
A
survey was conducted on the assessee and stock of cotton was found in excess by
155.39 quintals. The stock was valued at Rs. 6,85,270/- after allowing 10%
relief for non weighment by scale.
Plea of
the assess:
Since
the stock has not been weighed on the standardized scale , no addition for
excess stock can be made.
Argument
of the department and CIT A
It is
obligation cast by law on the assessee to afford necessary facility for
checking of stock and hence assessee has failed to provide weighment facility
for checking of the stock of cotton. Had the survey team stubbornly refused to
take inventory of stock by standardized scale provided by asseessee , only then
the stand of the assessee had been tenable.
Judgement
of the Court
Relevant
Extract of Section 133A
As per
Section 133A (1) “ ……an income authority may enter any place……at which a business or profession is
carried on, ……………………………, and require any proprietor, employee or
any other person who may at that time and place be attending in any manner to,
or helping in, the carrying on of such business or profession……………….to afford him the necessary facility to
check or verify the cash, stock or other valuable article or thing which may be
found therein
As per Section 133(6)” If a person under this
section is required to afford facility to the income-tax
authority to inspect books of account or other documents or to check or verify
any cash, stock or other valuable article or thing or to furnish any
information or to have his statement recorded either refuses or evades to do
so, the income-tax authority shall have all the powers under sub-section (1) of section 131
for enforcing compliance with the requirement made
Weighment
has to be done as per Standards of Weighment and Measurement Act
The ITAT
in para 6 of its Judgement has mentioned that it is not in dispute that weighment
has to be done in accordance with provisions of Standards of Weights and
Measurement Act 1976 (Now Legal Metrology Act 2009). As per section 3 of the
said Act, its provisions override the provisions of any other law.
What is
Mandate of section 133A
The Hon’ble Court also noted
that provisions of section 133A are marked times and again by words “require” ,
“is required”. Thus the mandate of section 133A is that it is the surveying
authority who is to “require” the person attending the business to afford
necessary facility to check or verify the stock. It is only on such requirement
having been expressed by the surveying authority that the said authority shall
essentially be afforded such facility for checking or verification of the stock
found in the survey. Hence it was obligatory on surveying authority to
“require” assessee to make available standardized scales for weighment . The
assessee is not obliged to provide what he is not “required”
Section
133A is based on principles of Natural Justice
The Hon’ble bench of ITAT
Amritsar also elaborated that use of word “require” in the section is clearly
based on natural justice principle that nobody , muchless a person as referred
to in the section can be presumed to know the law. Rather, in such a situation
like one at hand, the person needs must be aware, by statutory authority i.e.
Income tax authority, that the stock found in the survey is to be weighed as
per provisions of Standards of Weights and Measurement Act 1976 for which
necessary facility is to be provided by the person to the authority.
The Bench also held that it
is also trite that Income tax authority must help the assessee. The authority can not withhold such legal
requirement from the assessee prejudicially and then on the contrary hold the assesssee
liable for not making good such legal requirement.
This it is amply clear that
it is “first” for the surveying authority to “require” the person attending the
premises to afford the necessary facility.
Conclusion:
A closed mouthed frog can not catch any flies.
Hence the income tax authorities must “first “ require assessee to provide
standardized scales under the law before they aspire or expect the assesee to
provide necessary facility to check or verify stock. The Judgement also casts
duty on the knowledgeable one to enlighten the ignorant ones. In this case
survey team abstained from requiring and educating the assessee about need to
provide standard weighment scales inspite of express provisions of Standards of
Weights and Measuresment Act, 1976. And the
Judgment propounds that law can forgive a child who is afraid of dark but not
the men afraid of light.
No comments:
Post a Comment