Total Pageviews
Saturday, 26 December 2015
Third proviso to Section 254 (2A) was inserted by Finance Act 2008 to Overcome ruling of Bombay High Court in Narang coverseas 295 ITR 22 which said that ITAT could grant stay beyond 365 days where delay was not attributable to assessee.Seeton 254 (2A) specifically prohibited extension beyond 365 days even if delay not attributable to assessee. Delhi HC in Maruti Suzuki & Bombay HC in jethmal Fauzi Mal Soni also confirmed this third proviso to S.254 (2A) was not challenged. Now Delhi HC in Pepsi Foods Pvt.ltd. has struck down S. 254 (2A) third proviso being voilative of Act 14 Pepsi Foods P ltd. (Del HC ) 19.5.2015
Misapproprition of money by power of attorney holder who had authority to operate bank account of assessee in money lending business is incidental to carrying on of business.Hence deductible in computing profits of business Badridas Daga (SC) 25.04.1958
Loss on transfer of compensation bonds issued to assessee in consideration of assignment of debt receivable (in US dollars) from Iraq Govt.is not covered by head capital gain and hence no indexation can be made. However loss can be claimed as bad debt because payment received in form of bonds for services rendered under contract would not alter the character of income Ircon International Ltd. (Del HC ) 15.5.15 57TMC 336
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)