The word “month” has been mentioned in the Income tax law in
number of provisions. However the term has not been defined in the Income tax
law. Interpretation of the term poses number of issues especially in the
interest calculation. However to understand the controversy around it, we
shall have to start the journey from genesis as under: |
Total Pageviews
Wednesday, 30 December 2015
Decades long Controversy over defining “Month “ whether Calender Month or Lunar Month
Punjab & Haryana High Court in Sudhir Nagpal and Bros. ITA 463/2009 explained that if individual co owners join their resources and acquire property in name of AOP, only then it could be assessed in hands of AOP.Mere accruing of income to more than one person shall not constitute AOP.
VDIS Cases on Sale of Jewellery for assesses : -Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (ITAT Spcl. Bench) on 25.07.08 ITA 404/2003 -Tejinder Singh HUF ITA 163/ASR/2003,However remanded by P&HHC on 08.02.2011 in 292 CTR352 to Special Bench for hearing on 04-04-11 -Kiran Deepak Kukreja 190 Taxmann 393(BOM HC) -Uttam Chand Jain 182 Taxmann 243(BOM HC) -Jagdish Mitter TA 268/2002 -Mohan Lal Aggarwal All HC ITA 136/2010 -Yogesh Chand Sharma ITA 131/Agra/2011 -Sanjay Mahipal ITA 452/DEC/2009 Note Transaction of Rishi Grover Prop Vishnu Jeweller held genuine by ITAT Amritsar. ITA 198 TO 202/ASR/2006 26.06.09. MA 55 TO 59/ASR/2010 of department dismissed by ITAT on 26.06.2012.
Educational Institution providing advance to two organizations publishing magazine. Held that advance is incidental and ancillary to main objects. AP High Court quoted SC in Yogiraj Charity Trust 103 ITR 777 that if primary or dominant purpose is charitable , another object which may not be charitable but is incidental to primary object, would not prevent trust from being a valid trust Vijay Vani Education Trust (AP HC) 349 ITR 230
Compensation received from landlord for delay in actual delivery of leased premises. Pre-operative rent was credited to pre-operating expenses to be capitalized and post operative rent was credited to rent expenses. Held that no portion of compensation amount is taxable as revenue receipt. American Express (India) 79 DTR, 127 (Delhi Trib.)
Difference between purchase price and redemption price of debentures offered for taxation over a period of six years. Apex court upheld order of ITAT and reversed order of High court relying upon judgement of Bombay High Court in Taparia Tools Ltd. 260 ITR 102 (BOM)-Rakesh Shantilal Mardia (2012) 210 Taxmann 565(SC)
Singapore bank registered as FII, taking loan in foreign currency to invest in debentures and entered into forward contract to safeguard from foreign exchange fluctuation. Forward contract was terminated Held resulting gain is capital gain and exempt under Art 13 of DTAA Citi Corp Investment Bank (2012) 54 SOT 119 (Mum) (Trib)
A Trust predominantly engaged in ancilliary or incidental objects which are not related to any charitable purpose and does not carry on any activity relating to its main object of charitable nature (SCENTIFIC RESEARCH) is not entitled to exemption. Viswesvarya Indus R&D Centre (2012) 79 DTR387(BOM) HC
Objects altered without consent of department is not sufficient ground for invoking 12AA(3); Payment of commission for soliciting students for studying in Edu Institution can not be lead to conclusion that assessee was not imparting education Kirupanidhi Educational Trust (2012) 139ITR 228 (Bang Trib)
Scope and power of CIT u/s 12A/12AA favoring Assesse 1)Saint Kabir Education Trust (ITAT Asr)41 DTR 267 2)Dream Land Edu Trust (ITAT Asr)109 TTJ 850 3)DN Memorial Trust ITA 618/Asr/2011 4) Surya Educational Trust (P&H HC)15 TMC 123 5)Spring Dale Edu Society(P&H HC)16 TMC 285 6) Tishir Shiksha Prasar Samiti 217 TMC 525 7)Gagan Education society 145 TTJ 230 8)Divine Health Services ITA 417/2010
For 2(42A) calculation of 12m /36m ,” more then 12m/36m immediately preceeding date of transfer , date of transfer to be excluded. Month = calendar Month as defined in Gen Clauses Act 1897. If asset acquired on 2nd Jan period of 12m to expire on 1st Jan . Hence if asset sold on 2nd jan it is LTCA Bharti Ramola Gupta(Del HC)72 DTR 387
“………… The Supreme Court in Commr. of Agrl. IT vs. The Plantation Corporation of Kerala Ltd. (2000) 164 CTR (SC) 502 : AIR 2000 SC 3714 was concerned with whether the "Explanation" at the bottom of s. 5 of the Agrl. IT Act applied to the entire section or to only one of the clauses thereof. It was held that an Explanation below a particular clause/sub-section is intended to be an Explanation to that specific or particular clause/sub-section but when at the bottom of the section, is generally meant to explain the entire section……………”Quoted in Bagri Foundation 344 ITR 0193 (Delhi High Court)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)