1.
The
AO of the searched person is not required to examine whether the assets or
documents seized reflect undisclosed income. [Para 13]
2.
All that is required for him is to satisfy
himself that the assets or documents do not belong to the searched person but
to another person[Para 13]
3.
Thereafter, the AO has to transfer the seized
assets/documents to the AO having jurisdiction of the Assessee to whom such
assets/documents belong.[Para 13]
4.
The AO of the Assessee, on receiving the
documents and the assets seized, would have jurisdiction to commence
proceedings under Section 153C of the Act.[Para 13]
5.
Section 153C(1) of the Act clearly postulates
that once the AO of a person, other than the one searched, has received the
assets or the documents, he is to issue a notice to assess/re-assess the income
of such person - that is, the Assessee other than the person searched - in
accordance with provisions of Section 153A of the Act.
6.
The AO of the person other than the one
searched also, is not, at the stage of issuing notice under Section 153C/153A
of the Act, required to conclude that the assets/documents handed over to him
by the AO of the searched person represent or indicate any undisclosed income
of the Assessee under his jurisdiction.[Para35]
7.
As
explained in SSP Aviation (supra), Section 153C only enables the
AO of a person other than the one searched, to investigate into the documents
seized and/or the assets seized and ascertain that the same do not reflect any
undisclosed income of the Assessee (i.e a person other than the one searched)
for the relevant assessment years.[Para 35]
8.
If
the seized money, bullion, jewellery or other valuable article or thing seized
as handed over to the AO of the Assessee, are duly disclosed and reflected in
the returns filed by the Assessee, no further interference would be called for.
Similarly, if the books of accounts/documents seized do not reflect any
undisclosed income, the assessments already made cannot be interfered with [Para
35]
9.
Merely
because valuable articles and/or documents belonging to the Assessee have been
seized and handed over to the AO of the Assessee would not necessarily require
the AO to reopen the concluded assessments and reassess the income of the
Assessee [Para 35]
10 The
question whether the documents/assets seized could possibly reflect any
undisclosed income has to be considered by the AO after examining the seized
assets/documents handed over to him. It is only in cases where the seized
documents/assets could possibly reflect any undisclosed income of the Assessee
for the relevant assessment years, that further enquiry would be warranted in
respect of those years.[Para 36]
11 Whilst, it is not necessary for the AO to be satisfied that the assets/documents seized during search of another person reflect undisclosed income of an Assessee before commencing an enquiry under Section 153C of the Act, it would be impermissible for him to commence such enquiry if it is apparent that the documents/assets in question have no bearing on the income of the Assessee for the relevant assessment years.[Para 36]
11 Whilst, it is not necessary for the AO to be satisfied that the assets/documents seized during search of another person reflect undisclosed income of an Assessee before commencing an enquiry under Section 153C of the Act, it would be impermissible for him to commence such enquiry if it is apparent that the documents/assets in question have no bearing on the income of the Assessee for the relevant assessment years.[Para 36]
12 The concluded assessments cannot be
interfered with under Section 153A of the Act unless the incriminating material
belonging to the Assessee has been seized.[Para 37]
Delhi High Court Judgement in RRJ Securities Ltd
[2015] 62 taxmann.com 391 (Delhi)
30-10-2015
No comments:
Post a Comment