Total Pageviews
Wednesday, 30 December 2015
Singapore bank registered as FII, taking loan in foreign currency to invest in debentures and entered into forward contract to safeguard from foreign exchange fluctuation. Forward contract was terminated Held resulting gain is capital gain and exempt under Art 13 of DTAA Citi Corp Investment Bank (2012) 54 SOT 119 (Mum) (Trib)
A Trust predominantly engaged in ancilliary or incidental objects which are not related to any charitable purpose and does not carry on any activity relating to its main object of charitable nature (SCENTIFIC RESEARCH) is not entitled to exemption. Viswesvarya Indus R&D Centre (2012) 79 DTR387(BOM) HC
Objects altered without consent of department is not sufficient ground for invoking 12AA(3); Payment of commission for soliciting students for studying in Edu Institution can not be lead to conclusion that assessee was not imparting education Kirupanidhi Educational Trust (2012) 139ITR 228 (Bang Trib)
Scope and power of CIT u/s 12A/12AA favoring Assesse 1)Saint Kabir Education Trust (ITAT Asr)41 DTR 267 2)Dream Land Edu Trust (ITAT Asr)109 TTJ 850 3)DN Memorial Trust ITA 618/Asr/2011 4) Surya Educational Trust (P&H HC)15 TMC 123 5)Spring Dale Edu Society(P&H HC)16 TMC 285 6) Tishir Shiksha Prasar Samiti 217 TMC 525 7)Gagan Education society 145 TTJ 230 8)Divine Health Services ITA 417/2010
For 2(42A) calculation of 12m /36m ,” more then 12m/36m immediately preceeding date of transfer , date of transfer to be excluded. Month = calendar Month as defined in Gen Clauses Act 1897. If asset acquired on 2nd Jan period of 12m to expire on 1st Jan . Hence if asset sold on 2nd jan it is LTCA Bharti Ramola Gupta(Del HC)72 DTR 387
“………… The Supreme Court in Commr. of Agrl. IT vs. The Plantation Corporation of Kerala Ltd. (2000) 164 CTR (SC) 502 : AIR 2000 SC 3714 was concerned with whether the "Explanation" at the bottom of s. 5 of the Agrl. IT Act applied to the entire section or to only one of the clauses thereof. It was held that an Explanation below a particular clause/sub-section is intended to be an Explanation to that specific or particular clause/sub-section but when at the bottom of the section, is generally meant to explain the entire section……………”Quoted in Bagri Foundation 344 ITR 0193 (Delhi High Court)
Saturday, 26 December 2015
Third proviso to Section 254 (2A) was inserted by Finance Act 2008 to Overcome ruling of Bombay High Court in Narang coverseas 295 ITR 22 which said that ITAT could grant stay beyond 365 days where delay was not attributable to assessee.Seeton 254 (2A) specifically prohibited extension beyond 365 days even if delay not attributable to assessee. Delhi HC in Maruti Suzuki & Bombay HC in jethmal Fauzi Mal Soni also confirmed this third proviso to S.254 (2A) was not challenged. Now Delhi HC in Pepsi Foods Pvt.ltd. has struck down S. 254 (2A) third proviso being voilative of Act 14 Pepsi Foods P ltd. (Del HC ) 19.5.2015
Misapproprition of money by power of attorney holder who had authority to operate bank account of assessee in money lending business is incidental to carrying on of business.Hence deductible in computing profits of business Badridas Daga (SC) 25.04.1958
Loss on transfer of compensation bonds issued to assessee in consideration of assignment of debt receivable (in US dollars) from Iraq Govt.is not covered by head capital gain and hence no indexation can be made. However loss can be claimed as bad debt because payment received in form of bonds for services rendered under contract would not alter the character of income Ircon International Ltd. (Del HC ) 15.5.15 57TMC 336
Tuesday, 22 December 2015
SC in Goetze India had held that although AO can not accept the claim of the assessee except through return or revised return but in the same decision, the hon'ble apex court made it clear that this did not impinge on the power of the Tribunal. The above position of law revisited by ITAT Delhi in Micron Instruments[2015] 63 taxmann.com 180 (Del Trib) and claim of CLU charges paid along with interest in instalment by factory already working for last 30 years allowed as revenue expenditure although claim made only by simple letter during assessment
Held By ITAT Chandigarh in Smart Value Product & Services Ltd ITA 685/2014 dtd 28-10-2015 that addition made by AO for negative stock by preparing monthly trading account is not sustainable. Similar decision has been given by ITAT Chandigarh in M/s Saqi Brothers V ITO ITA No. 279/Chd/1990 which has been confirmed by Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court vide judgment ITR No. 70 of 1998 dated 31.10.2006
Punjab and Haryana High Court on deduction to LIC Employees u/s 10(14)
I.T.A.
NO. 645 OF 2005 [1]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
I.T.A. NO. 645 OF 2005
DATE OF DECISION: 21.04.2006
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PATIALA
....APPELLANT
VERSUS
BRANCH MANAGER, LIC OF INDIA, SANGRUR (PUNJAB)
....RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
PRESENT: DR. N.L. SHARDA, ADVOCATE
FOR THE APPELLANT-REVENUE.
Monday, 21 December 2015
Decades long Controversy over defining “Month “ whether Calender Month or Lunar Month
The word “month” has been mentioned in the Income tax law in
number of provisions. However the term has not been defined in the Income tax
law. Interpretation of the term poses number of issues especially in the
interest calculation. However to understand the controversy around it, we
shall have to start the journey from genesis as under: |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)