Third proviso to Section 254 (2A) was inserted by Finance Act 2008 to Overcome ruling of Bombay High Court in Narang coverseas 295 ITR 22 which said that ITAT could grant stay beyond 365 days where delay was not attributable to assessee.Seeton 254 (2A) specifically prohibited extension beyond 365 days even if delay not attributable to assessee. Delhi HC in Maruti Suzuki & Bombay HC in jethmal Fauzi Mal Soni also confirmed this third proviso to S.254 (2A) was not challenged. Now Delhi HC in Pepsi Foods Pvt.ltd. has struck down S. 254 (2A) third proviso being voilative of Act 14 Pepsi Foods P ltd. (Del HC ) 19.5.2015