Total Pageviews

Saturday 6 October 2012

Underwriting commission and interest on bonds earned by a co-op bank is entitled for deduction under section 80P


[2012] 25 taxmann.com 237 (SC)
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Commissioner of Income-tax, Jalandhar
v.
Nawanshahar Central Co-op. Bank Ltd.*
S.H. KAPADIA, CJ.
MADAN B. LOKUR, J.
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5975 & 5976 OF 2004
AUGUST 30, 2012
Section 80P of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Deduction - Income of co-operative society - Whether a Co-operative bank is entitled for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) in respect of income earned from underwriting commission and interest on PSEB Bonds and IDBI Bonds - Held, yes [In favour of assessee]
CASE REVIEW

CIT v. Nawanshahar Central Co-op Bank Ltd. [2007] 160 Taxman 48 (SC) (para 2) followed.
ORDER

Heard learned counsel on both sides.
The civil appeals are dismissed.
No order as to costs.
ORDER

Heard learned counsel on both sides. In these appeals, following questions of law arise for determination:
"[a]  Whether the High Court was justified in holding that the Respondent-Assessee was entitled for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in respect of income from underwriting commission and interest on PSEB Bonds and IDBI Bonds?
[b]  Whether the High Court was justified in affirming the decision of the Tribunal that the income earned by the Assessee which was derived from underwriting the issue of bonds and investments in PSEB Bonds was in the nature of income from banking business and hence qualified for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?"
In view of the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar v. Nawanshahar Central Cooperative Bank Limited [Civil Appeal No.2499 of 2005/[2007] 160 Taxman 48 (SC) @ S.L.P. (C) No.3826 of 2004], these civil appeals filed by the Department are dismissed.
No order as to costs.

Payments made by assessee manufacturer of milk products to milk producers through an agent in cash for purchase of milk are covered by exception clauses (f) and (l) of rule 6DD

[2012] 25 taxmann.com 209 (Hyderabad - Trib.) Heritage Foods (India) Ltd.*

CIT can not reject stay of demand without reasons

Order rejecting stay on demand should be reasoned one - Application for stay of demand of tax cannot be rejected without considering assessee's submissions and without giving reasons for rejection
Balaji Universal Tradelink (P.) Ltd. [2012] 25 taxmann.com 256 (Bombay)

No TDS on Reimbursement of Charges

Reimbursement of validation charges in respect of testing of medicine manufactured under contract 
[2012] 26 taxmann.com 7 (Bangalore - Trib.) Allergan India (P.) Ltd.

WDV of an asset which had been written off from books on ground of its being obsolete, has to be reduced from WDV of block of assets

Allergan India (P.) Ltd. [2012] 26 taxmann.com 7 (Bangalore - Trib.)

Ignorance of law by Non Resident is valid excuse for penalty

Where foreign company having deputed assessee-non-resident in India, paid salary to him after deducting taxes payable, failure of assessee to show said income in his return was to be regarded as bona fide mistake for which penalty under sec. 271(1)(c) could not be levied
Emilio Ruiz Berdejo [2012] 26 taxmann.com 24 (Pune - Trib.)

Where land sold by assessee to builder had been acquired by Government and assessee had received no compensation, no capital gains arose to assessee even though he received consideration from builder

Tej Singh [2012] 25 taxmann.com 573 (Agra - Trib.)
Anil Kumar Forma (HUF) v. CIT [2007] 289 ITR 245/163 Taxman 182 (Mad.) and CIT v. Karambir Singh [2008] 303 ITR 231/169 Taxman 85 (Punj. & Har.) (para 6.3) followed.

Institute providing academic services and applying income towards same is entitled to registration - Where assessee - Institute was registering students to write exams conducted by ICS, London, and providing necessary academic support to them and applying income towards purpose of Institute, registration u/s 12AA could not be denied

[2012] 25 taxmann.com 289 (Chennai - Trib.) Institute of Chartered Shipbrokers

No addition for investment in property can be made where rental income is disproportionately high

[2012] 25 taxmann.com 550 (Delhi) Dinesh Jain HUF
Valuation provisions of wealth tax also can not be used

Details disclosed in Income-tax returns are exempt from disclosure under RTI Act unless disclosure justified in larger public interest

Girish Ramchandra Deshpande [2012] 25 taxmann.com 525 (SC)

Where there was difference of opinion between judicial authorities on allowance of credit u/s 88E and view taken by Assessing Officer in course of assessment was in accordance with judicial precedents, revision was not justified

[2012] 26 taxmann.com 55 (Kolkata - Trib.) Todi Securities (P.) Ltd.

No denial of section 54F exemption on registration of residential property in name of minor daughter - Exemption under section 54F will be admissible even where assessee has registered residential house property in name of his minor daughter

N. Ram Kumar [2012] 25 taxmann.com 337 (Hyderabad - Trib.)
Mir Gulam Ali Khan v. CIT [1987] 165 ITR 228/[1986] 28 Taxman 572, CIT v. Ravindra Kumar Arora [2012] 342 ITR 38/[2011] 203 Taxman 289/15 taxmann.com 307 (Delhi) and Third ITO v. S. Vardarajan [1989] 33 TTJ 466 (Mad.) (para 7) followed.

Jainarayan v. ITO [2008] 306 ITR 335 (Punj. & Har.); Parkash v. ITO [2009] 312 ITR 40/[2008] 173 Taxman 311 (Mum.) and ITO v.Prakash Timeji Dhanjede [2002] 258 ITR (AT) 114 (Nag.) (para 7) distinguished.

Where Assessing Officer undertakes scrutiny assessment, raises queries and after that does not make any addition, Assessing Officer can be said to have formed an opinion and reopening of such an assessment would be held to be due to mere change of opinion

Gujarat Power Corpn. Ltd. [2012] 26 taxmann.com 51 (Gujarat)